One platform, eleven classes, and what each of the others publishes beside it
Every vendor on this page is good at something. The question this table answers is narrower: which coverage classes each one carries as a first-class capability of its autonomous platform, and which it sells beside the platform as a scoped engagement, an add-on, or a roadmap entry. All four distinctions are checkable in each vendor’s own pages, and every cell below was read there, on the date it carries. Where a competitor beats B-52, the row says so before anything else is argued.
How to read this matrix
The one test every row is scored on
Every row is scored on one question: is the class a first-class capability of the vendor’s autonomous platform, or is it sold beside the platform? The distinction is checkable in each vendor’s own material, and it sits in a different place for each of them. Pentera publishes mobile, thick-client and LLM red-teaming under SECTOR11: scoped human engagements their own page describes as complementing the platform, not being it. Horizon3 sells web application testing as a paid add-on outside every base tier. XBOW places everything except web applications and their APIs on a roadmap, in its own documentation. Hadrian splits discovery (Atlas) from pentest depth (Nova), and nothing on either page reaches inside a network. Neither form is a defect. A scoped human engagement is often the better buy. What a buyer needs is to know which form they are pricing: because the two produce different cadences, different signatures and different per-run costs, and vendor homepages do not volunteer the difference.
The rule applied to every cell: No bare "No", "Partial" or "Unknown": each cell carries the vendor’s own published language (or the precise absence), the page it was read on, and the date. Absence on first-party pages is stated as exactly that: an absence of documentation, never an absence of capability.
The run the classes are delivered in
Six phases, every class, every run
The matrix scores what each platform covers. What a covered class produces is a run of the same six phases, ending in a QA gate that sits after reporting: the shape every row in the tables below is read against.
-
Discovery
What is there, inside the scope you signed off
-
Planning
A mindmap, and the test cases this application needs
-
Scanning
Candidates, none of which is a finding yet
-
Exploitation
Proved, or dropped. Nothing survives on a guess
-
Reporting
The report, and the findings in your dashboard
-
QA
A gate that can send the finished report back
The sixth phase runs on the finished report. When it sends one back, reporting runs again.
The matrix
Eleven classes, 5 platforms, one question per cell
Read down a class for the market; read across a vendor for their shape. The verdict column answers the one test; the middle column is the vendor’s own language it comes from; the line under each row is where it was read and when.
Web application
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | Core publishes "OWASP Top 10 Testing" as a shipping capability (pentera.io/pentera-core/, read 2026-09-14). A separate AI-native web application capability was announced 29 Jul 2026 "in beta to selected customers, with general availability rolling out in Q4 2026" (pentera.io/press-release/, read 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28: no GA announcement published yet). | Yes: shipping in Core; the AI-native successor is in beta. |
| XBOW | "XBOW currently supports testing web applications and their APIs" (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | Yes: the core of the product. |
| Horizon3 | NodeZero WebApp: route discovery and crawling via headless browser, multi-role authenticated testing, parameter testing, exploitation, attack chaining (horizon3.ai/nodezero/webapp/, read 2026-09-14). Sold as an add-on "to any Package, or standalone": WebApp Flex at $10,000 per asset per test (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28). | No: a paid add-on beside every tier, not inside one. |
| Hadrian | Nova: "Point Nova at an application"; "a fleet of AI hacker agents works through it the way a skilled pentester would, step by step, until it can show real impact"; most tests complete in 24–48 hours; from €1,250 per test ex-VAT. No formal target-type list is published. | Yes, it is Nova’s entire job, without a published target taxonomy. |
| B-52 | Covered, including authenticated flows and the authorisation decisions behind each role, credential supplied per role; reachable from the self-serve flow (b52security.com/platform/, read 2026-10-28). | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 01: Web application
Pentera
- As published
- Core publishes "OWASP Top 10 Testing" as a shipping capability (pentera.io/pentera-core/, read 2026-09-14). A separate AI-native web application capability was announced 29 Jul 2026 "in beta to selected customers, with general availability rolling out in Q4 2026" (pentera.io/press-release/, read 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28: no GA announcement published yet).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: shipping in Core; the AI-native successor is in beta.
XBOW
- As published
- "XBOW currently supports testing web applications and their APIs" (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: the core of the product.
Horizon3
- As published
- NodeZero WebApp: route discovery and crawling via headless browser, multi-role authenticated testing, parameter testing, exploitation, attack chaining (horizon3.ai/nodezero/webapp/, read 2026-09-14). Sold as an add-on "to any Package, or standalone": WebApp Flex at $10,000 per asset per test (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No: a paid add-on beside every tier, not inside one.
Hadrian
- As published
- Nova: "Point Nova at an application"; "a fleet of AI hacker agents works through it the way a skilled pentester would, step by step, until it can show real impact"; most tests complete in 24–48 hours; from €1,250 per test ex-VAT. No formal target-type list is published.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes, it is Nova’s entire job, without a published target taxonomy.
- As published
- Covered, including authenticated flows and the authorisation decisions behind each role, credential supplied per role; reachable from the self-serve flow (b52security.com/platform/, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
Mobile application
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | Not present on any platform page (read 2026-09-14). Published under SECTOR11: "Research-led testing of web, mobile, API, and thick-client applications" (pentera.io/adversarial-testing-services/, read 2026-09-14). | No: human-delivered engagement, sold beside the platform. |
| XBOW | "Support for penetration testing of other asset types is on our roadmap." Mobile is not named as supported (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No: roadmap. |
| Horizon3 | Not named among the modules in any tier, nor as an add-on; the pricing page names two add-ons only: WebApp Flex and WebApp Continuous (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28). | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| Hadrian | Not mentioned on the Hadrian, Atlas or Nova pages. Atlas coverage is explicitly external-facing: "found from the outside". | No: capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| B-52 | Covered on the platform, all three delivery models, reachable from the self-serve flow. Release builds tested as published: obfuscated, certificate-pinned, defended at runtime, no source required. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 02: Mobile application
Pentera
- As published
- Not present on any platform page (read 2026-09-14). Published under SECTOR11: "Research-led testing of web, mobile, API, and thick-client applications" (pentera.io/adversarial-testing-services/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- No: human-delivered engagement, sold beside the platform.
XBOW
- As published
- "Support for penetration testing of other asset types is on our roadmap." Mobile is not named as supported (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No: roadmap.
Horizon3
- As published
- Not named among the modules in any tier, nor as an add-on; the pricing page names two add-ons only: WebApp Flex and WebApp Continuous (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
Hadrian
- As published
- Not mentioned on the Hadrian, Atlas or Nova pages. Atlas coverage is explicitly external-facing: "found from the outside".
- First-class on the platform?
- No: capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
- As published
- Covered on the platform, all three delivery models, reachable from the self-serve flow. Release builds tested as published: obfuscated, certificate-pinned, defended at runtime, no source required.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
This row and rows 04 and 10 are the ones where the column set is empty: none of the four publishes the class as a platform capability. A buyer whose load-bearing requirement is mobile, thick-client or code review work has exactly one platform option on this table.
API
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | Surface names APIs as an asset class: "Validate VPNs, Git, SSH, storage, APIs, and web services — not just web applications" (pentera.io/pentera-surface/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes: named asset class on Surface. |
| XBOW | Supported, in the same sentence as web applications (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | Yes. |
| Horizon3 | REST, SOAP and GraphQL endpoint discovery is named inside the WebApp add-on (horizon3.ai/nodezero/webapp/, read 2026-09-14). Not published as a standalone class. | No: a feature inside a paid add-on, not a class. |
| Hadrian | API testing is not explicitly named as its own category on hadrian.io, /atlas or /nova. Nova’s application testing may include API work; the pages do not say. | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| B-52 | Covered as its own class: an authorisation matrix written first, then routes checked with a second credential, reachable from the self-serve flow. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 03: API
Pentera
- As published
- Surface names APIs as an asset class: "Validate VPNs, Git, SSH, storage, APIs, and web services — not just web applications" (pentera.io/pentera-surface/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: named asset class on Surface.
XBOW
- As published
- Supported, in the same sentence as web applications (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes.
Horizon3
- As published
- REST, SOAP and GraphQL endpoint discovery is named inside the WebApp add-on (horizon3.ai/nodezero/webapp/, read 2026-09-14). Not published as a standalone class.
- First-class on the platform?
- No: a feature inside a paid add-on, not a class.
Hadrian
- As published
- API testing is not explicitly named as its own category on hadrian.io, /atlas or /nova. Nova’s application testing may include API work; the pages do not say.
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
- As published
- Covered as its own class: an authorisation matrix written first, then routes checked with a second credential, reachable from the self-serve flow.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
Thick client
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | SECTOR11 only (pentera.io/adversarial-testing-services/, read 2026-09-14). Not on any platform page. | No: human-delivered engagement. |
| XBOW | Roadmap; not named as supported (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No. |
| Horizon3 | Not named as a module or add-on (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28). | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| Hadrian | Not mentioned on any Hadrian page. | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| B-52 | Covered on the platform, reachable from the self-serve flow. Four application types worked: Windows native (.NET, C++, Win32), Java desktop, Electron and web-wrapped, and client-server protocol/local-storage analysis. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 04: Thick client
Pentera
- As published
- SECTOR11 only (pentera.io/adversarial-testing-services/, read 2026-09-14). Not on any platform page.
- First-class on the platform?
- No: human-delivered engagement.
XBOW
- As published
- Roadmap; not named as supported (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
Horizon3
- As published
- Not named as a module or add-on (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
Hadrian
- As published
- Not mentioned on any Hadrian page.
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
- As published
- Covered on the platform, reachable from the self-serve flow. Four application types worked: Windows native (.NET, C++, Win32), Java desktop, Electron and web-wrapped, and client-server protocol/local-storage analysis.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
External network
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | Pentera Surface: "External network security validation" (pentera.io/pentera-platform/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes: a named module. |
| XBOW | Not a supported asset type; a target must be an application or API reachable from the public internet (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No. |
| Horizon3 | External Pentesting, in every tier including entry (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28); executed in Horizon3’s cloud on "dedicated, ephemeral resources" (horizon3.ai/nodezero/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes. |
| Hadrian | Atlas: "Continuous external exposure management": "Everything your company exposes on the internet," discovered "from the outside," domains, DNS, IPs, certificates, cloud services and apps; exposures "chained and exploited the way a skilled attacker would". | Yes, as discovery plus exposure validation; pentest depth sits in Nova. |
| B-52 | Covered: perimeter worked out from announced ranges, resolving names and what answers on each address, then proposed back to you as the scope. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 05: External network
Pentera
- As published
- Pentera Surface: "External network security validation" (pentera.io/pentera-platform/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: a named module.
XBOW
- As published
- Not a supported asset type; a target must be an application or API reachable from the public internet (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
Horizon3
- As published
- External Pentesting, in every tier including entry (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28); executed in Horizon3’s cloud on "dedicated, ephemeral resources" (horizon3.ai/nodezero/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes.
Hadrian
- As published
- Atlas: "Continuous external exposure management": "Everything your company exposes on the internet," discovered "from the outside," domains, DNS, IPs, certificates, cloud services and apps; exposures "chained and exploited the way a skilled attacker would".
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes, as discovery plus exposure validation; pentest depth sits in Nova.
- As published
- Covered: perimeter worked out from announced ranges, resolving names and what answers on each address, then proposed back to you as the scope.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
Internal network
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | Pentera Core: "AI-driven pentesting to continuously test your production environments at scale": lateral movement, privilege escalation, domain admin compromise, credential assessment, segmentation (pentera.io/pentera-core/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes, and deeper than B-52. Conceded by name; see concessions. |
| XBOW | Roadmap; documented preconditions exclude targets behind a VPN or blocking network configuration (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No. |
| Horizon3 | Internal Pentesting in every tier; runs "from a free Docker host or open virtualization appliance (OVA) that you can set up in minutes" (horizon3.ai/nodezero/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes: their home ground. |
| Hadrian | Not mentioned on any Hadrian page. Coverage is explicitly external-facing. | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| B-52 | Covered. The one class that needs something deployed inside your network, with on-premise and customer-VPC deployments available, residency in India, the EU, the US and Singapore. No depth claim against Core anywhere on this estate. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 06: Internal network
Pentera
- As published
- Pentera Core: "AI-driven pentesting to continuously test your production environments at scale": lateral movement, privilege escalation, domain admin compromise, credential assessment, segmentation (pentera.io/pentera-core/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes, and deeper than B-52. Conceded by name; see concessions.
XBOW
- As published
- Roadmap; documented preconditions exclude targets behind a VPN or blocking network configuration (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
Horizon3
- As published
- Internal Pentesting in every tier; runs "from a free Docker host or open virtualization appliance (OVA) that you can set up in minutes" (horizon3.ai/nodezero/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: their home ground.
Hadrian
- As published
- Not mentioned on any Hadrian page. Coverage is explicitly external-facing.
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
- As published
- Covered. The one class that needs something deployed inside your network, with on-premise and customer-VPC deployments available, residency in India, the EU, the US and Singapore. No depth claim against Core anywhere on this estate.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
Cloud
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | Pentera Cloud: "Cloud identity and hybrid environment security validation" across AWS and Azure (pentera.io/pentera-cloud/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes: a named module. |
| XBOW | Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No. |
| Horizon3 | Cloud Pentesting in every tier; names AWS, Azure and Kubernetes; "NodeZero is deployable both on-prem and in the cloud" (horizon3.ai/nodezero/cloud-pentesting/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes. |
| Hadrian | Atlas covers "risky cloud services and storage" as an exposure and misconfiguration solution, found externally. Cloud penetration testing as a class is not published. | Partial as published: exposure discovery from the outside, not an inside-the-account pentest class. |
| B-52 | Covered: the identity and permission layer, proved by making the call. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 07: Cloud
Pentera
- As published
- Pentera Cloud: "Cloud identity and hybrid environment security validation" across AWS and Azure (pentera.io/pentera-cloud/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: a named module.
XBOW
- As published
- Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
Horizon3
- As published
- Cloud Pentesting in every tier; names AWS, Azure and Kubernetes; "NodeZero is deployable both on-prem and in the cloud" (horizon3.ai/nodezero/cloud-pentesting/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes.
Hadrian
- As published
- Atlas covers "risky cloud services and storage" as an exposure and misconfiguration solution, found externally. Cloud penetration testing as a class is not published.
- First-class on the platform?
- Partial as published: exposure discovery from the outside, not an inside-the-account pentest class.
- As published
- Covered: the identity and permission layer, proved by making the call.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
Active Directory
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | Core: credential and password assessment, domain admin compromise (pentera.io/pentera-core/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes, and deeper than B-52. Conceded by name; see concessions. |
| XBOW | Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No. |
| Horizon3 | "AD password audits" in every tier (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28); internal pentesting page names credential attacks, password spraying, Zerologon, aligned to MITRE ATT&CK (horizon3.ai/nodezero/internal-pentesting/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes, as an audit inside every tier. |
| Hadrian | Not mentioned on any Hadrian page. | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| B-52 | Covered: privilege paths walked end to end. Not to the depth Pentera Core reaches; that concession lives on /compare/pentera/ and is not repeated defensively here. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 08: Active Directory
Pentera
- As published
- Core: credential and password assessment, domain admin compromise (pentera.io/pentera-core/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes, and deeper than B-52. Conceded by name; see concessions.
XBOW
- As published
- Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
Horizon3
- As published
- "AD password audits" in every tier (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28); internal pentesting page names credential attacks, password spraying, Zerologon, aligned to MITRE ATT&CK (horizon3.ai/nodezero/internal-pentesting/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes, as an audit inside every tier.
Hadrian
- As published
- Not mentioned on any Hadrian page.
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
- As published
- Covered: privilege paths walked end to end. Not to the depth Pentera Core reaches; that concession lives on /compare/pentera/ and is not repeated defensively here.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
Social engineering
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | "Phishing Attack Emulation — Emulate phishing campaigns to determine whether attackers can capture credentials or execute malicious payloads" (pentera.io/pentera-surface/, read 2026-09-14). | Yes, in the product, on Surface. |
| XBOW | Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No. |
| Horizon3 | Phishing Impact Testing in every tier (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28). | Yes. |
| Hadrian | Not published as social engineering. Adjacent: an Infostealer credential-leak-detection add-on on Atlas ("dark web scanning and credential leak monitoring"): exposure monitoring, not a campaign-run assessment. | No: an adjacent monitoring add-on only. |
| B-52 | Covered, scoped separately from the other classes. Three forms, one boundary: targeted phishing simulation; pretexting and credential harvesting inside an attack chain; OSINT and target enumeration feeding the campaign. Run under written authorisation naming the population and the window. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 09: Social engineering
Pentera
- As published
- "Phishing Attack Emulation — Emulate phishing campaigns to determine whether attackers can capture credentials or execute malicious payloads" (pentera.io/pentera-surface/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes, in the product, on Surface.
XBOW
- As published
- Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
Horizon3
- As published
- Phishing Impact Testing in every tier (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes.
Hadrian
- As published
- Not published as social engineering. Adjacent: an Infostealer credential-leak-detection add-on on Atlas ("dark web scanning and credential leak monitoring"): exposure monitoring, not a campaign-run assessment.
- First-class on the platform?
- No: an adjacent monitoring add-on only.
- As published
- Covered, scoped separately from the other classes. Three forms, one boundary: targeted phishing simulation; pretexting and credential harvesting inside an attack chain; OSINT and target enumeration feeding the campaign. Run under written authorisation naming the population and the window.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
Secure code review
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | Not present on the platform pages or the services page. Their integration catalogue ingests findings from Checkmarx, Veracode, Semgrep, SonarQube, Snyk, Coverity, BlackDuck, Contrast and Mend.io: consuming static-analysis output, not performing the review (pentera.io/integrations/, read 2026-09-14). | No. |
| XBOW | Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No. |
| Horizon3 | Not named as a module or add-on (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28). | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| Hadrian | Not mentioned on any Hadrian page. | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| B-52 | Covered, reachable from the self-serve flow. A file, a line, the path an attacker takes to reach that line, and the closing change in the repository’s own idiom. Code deleted after thirty days of inactivity. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 10: Secure code review
Pentera
- As published
- Not present on the platform pages or the services page. Their integration catalogue ingests findings from Checkmarx, Veracode, Semgrep, SonarQube, Snyk, Coverity, BlackDuck, Contrast and Mend.io: consuming static-analysis output, not performing the review (pentera.io/integrations/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
XBOW
- As published
- Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
Horizon3
- As published
- Not named as a module or add-on (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
Hadrian
- As published
- Not mentioned on any Hadrian page.
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
- As published
- Covered, reachable from the self-serve flow. A file, a line, the path an attacker takes to reach that line, and the closing change in the repository’s own idiom. Code deleted after thirty days of inactivity.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
LLM applications
| Vendor | As published | First-class on the platform? |
|---|---|---|
| Pentera | "AI Red Teaming" is published under SECTOR11: a human engagement, not a platform capability (pentera.io/adversarial-testing-services/, read 2026-09-14). | No: sold beside the platform. |
| XBOW | Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28). | No. |
| Horizon3 | Not named as a module or add-on (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28). | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| Hadrian | Markets itself at "the frontier of agentic AI-driven offensive security": that is using AI to attack, not a published class for testing LLM applications. No LLM target type is published. | Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28. |
| B-52 | Covered on the platform. Three forms: prompt injection and jailbreak testing (direct and indirect), model endpoint and API security, and agentic systems: tool misuse, autonomy boundaries, unintended chaining. Model provenance and training data deliberately out of scope, by number, on the class page. | Yes: first-class on the platform. |
Coverage class 11: LLM applications
Pentera
- As published
- "AI Red Teaming" is published under SECTOR11: a human engagement, not a platform capability (pentera.io/adversarial-testing-services/, read 2026-09-14).
- First-class on the platform?
- No: sold beside the platform.
XBOW
- As published
- Roadmap (docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- No.
Horizon3
- As published
- Not named as a module or add-on (horizon3.ai/pricing/, read 2026-10-28).
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
Hadrian
- As published
- Markets itself at "the frontier of agentic AI-driven offensive security": that is using AI to attack, not a published class for testing LLM applications. No LLM target type is published.
- First-class on the platform?
- Capability not documented on first-party pages as of 2026-10-28.
- As published
- Covered on the platform. Three forms: prompt injection and jailbreak testing (direct and indirect), model endpoint and API security, and agentic systems: tool misuse, autonomy boundaries, unintended chaining. Model provenance and training data deliberately out of scope, by number, on the class page.
- First-class on the platform?
- Yes: first-class on the platform.
The exclusion row
Physical, hardware and wireless testing. Not a question this matrix checked for the four vendors, and nothing is claimed about any of them. Out of scope for B-52 entirely, in every class: the one exclusion, stated the same way on every page of the site.
Concessions
The row where each competitor beats B-52
One per competitor, named. A matrix that concedes nothing reads as a brochure and gets checked.
| Competitor | What they do better than B-52 |
|---|---|
| Pentera | Internal network and Active Directory depth. Pentera Core runs the internal chain: credential assessment, lateral movement, privilege escalation, domain admin compromise and segmentation, continuously against production. The B-52 column claims breadth only. |
| Read 2026-09-14. | |
| XBOW | An offensive track record on scoreboards nobody controls. Ranked number one on HackerOne in June 2025; first autonomous system ranked on Microsoft’s researcher leaderboard; 14k+ zero-days claimed with named CVEs documented on their blog (xbow.com, read 2026-09-14). No equivalent externally checkable evidence is published on this estate, and waving it away would be the least credible thing the matrix could do. |
| Read 2026-09-14. | |
| Horizon3 | Kubernetes, in every tier. NodeZero "deploys within Kubernetes clusters using Kubernetes Operators and Infrastructure-as-Code (kubectl)" and tests live clusters for RBAC misconfigurations, container escapes and secret exposures, entry tier included (horizon3.ai/nodezero/kubernetes-pentesting/ + /pricing/, read 2026-09-14 and 2026-10-28). Kubernetes is not one of B-52’s eleven classes. If it is on the buyer’s list, this is a straight gap on our side. |
| Read 2026-10-28. | |
| Hadrian | Atlas maps subsidiaries, acquisitions, domains, subdomains, certificates and cloud hosts continuously, with hourly passive scans, new tests on every change, infostealer leak detection and an M&A assessment add-on. B-52 derives the perimeter per run and has no standing discovery product. For a buyer whose problem is not knowing what they own, Atlas answers a question B-52 has not built. |
| Read 2026-10-28. | |
One concession per competitor, each with its source
- What they do better than B-52
- Internal network and Active Directory depth. Pentera Core runs the internal chain: credential assessment, lateral movement, privilege escalation, domain admin compromise and segmentation, continuously against production. The B-52 column claims breadth only.
Read 2026-09-14.
- What they do better than B-52
- An offensive track record on scoreboards nobody controls. Ranked number one on HackerOne in June 2025; first autonomous system ranked on Microsoft’s researcher leaderboard; 14k+ zero-days claimed with named CVEs documented on their blog (xbow.com, read 2026-09-14). No equivalent externally checkable evidence is published on this estate, and waving it away would be the least credible thing the matrix could do.
Read 2026-09-14.
- What they do better than B-52
- Kubernetes, in every tier. NodeZero "deploys within Kubernetes clusters using Kubernetes Operators and Infrastructure-as-Code (kubectl)" and tests live clusters for RBAC misconfigurations, container escapes and secret exposures, entry tier included (horizon3.ai/nodezero/kubernetes-pentesting/ + /pricing/, read 2026-09-14 and 2026-10-28). Kubernetes is not one of B-52’s eleven classes. If it is on the buyer’s list, this is a straight gap on our side.
Read 2026-10-28.
Hadrian
- What they do better than B-52
- Atlas maps subsidiaries, acquisitions, domains, subdomains, certificates and cloud hosts continuously, with hourly passive scans, new tests on every change, infostealer leak detection and an M&A assessment add-on. B-52 derives the perimeter per run and has no standing discovery product. For a buyer whose problem is not knowing what they own, Atlas answers a question B-52 has not built.
Read 2026-10-28.
Second-order concessions carried from the compare pages and inherited here: Pentera’s production-safety guardrails, certifications (ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001, ISO 9001, SOC 2 Type II) and Resolve; XBOW’s date-versioned public API and cloud-marketplace procurement; Horizon3’s FedRAMP High authorisation (FR1802451335) and self-service 30-day trial; Hadrian’s SOC 2 Type 2 badge and named-customer wall. Full sourcing in each vendor’s /compare/ claims table; no concession is repeated here without its page.
What will move first
Four cells with a short half-life
Every product named here is being actively developed, and a capability can arrive between one reading and the next. These are the rows most likely to move, and where to re-read them.
01 Pentera web application
The Q4 2026 GA window is open as of this writing; re-read the press release and pentera.io/pentera-platform/ before any reliance. On 2026-10-28 the platform page carried "AI-Native Web App testing" as a named solution, with no GA announcement. When GA lands, row 01 changes for Pentera and its date changes with it.
02 XBOW asset types
Their roadmap ships. The docs URL is now docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types (the /target-types/ URL redirects); re-read before relying on rows 02–11.
03 Horizon3 pricing
Figures ($15/$50/$65/$85 per asset; WebApp $10,000/custom) were published by 2026-10-28 and were absent on 2026-09-14. A page this new moves; re-read before quoting any figure.
04 Hadrian, wholesale
Every Hadrian cell in this matrix was verified 2026-10-28 in one sitting: it is the youngest position on the page and the most likely to be stale. Their module list is two products deep and growing.
Source register
What was read, and when
Every cell above was read on a first-party page: the vendor’s own, wherever one exists. This is the register of those reads. Where a figure appears in the matrix, it carries its read date and expires on the next re-read.
| # | Claim family | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pentera module structure; Core coverage incl. OWASP Top 10; guardrails | pentera.io/pentera-platform/, pentera.io/pentera-core/ | 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28 |
| 2 | Pentera Surface: APIs as asset class; phishing emulation | pentera.io/pentera-surface/ | 2026-09-14 |
| 3 | Pentera Cloud: AWS/Azure capabilities | pentera.io/pentera-cloud/ | 2026-09-14 |
| 4 | Pentera web-app beta/GA sentence | pentera.io/press-release/pentera-ai-web-app-pentesting/ | 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28 |
| 5 | Pentera SECTOR11 scope (mobile, thick client, AI red teaming) | pentera.io/adversarial-testing-services/ | 2026-09-14 |
| 6 | Pentera SAST ingestion, not review; integrations | pentera.io/integrations/ | 2026-09-14 |
| 7 | XBOW supported asset types + roadmap + untestable conditions | docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types (moved from /target-types/) | 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28 |
| 8 | XBOW platform autonomy + governance language | xbow.com/platform | 2026-09-14 |
| 9 | XBOW track record (HackerOne, MSRC, CVEs) | xbow.com/ | 2026-09-14 |
| 10 | Horizon3 tier contents; WebApp add-on; per-asset figures | horizon3.ai/pricing/ | 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28 |
| 11 | Horizon3 internal/external/cloud/Kubernetes/WebApp module pages | horizon3.ai/nodezero/ (+ subpages) | 2026-09-14 |
| 12 | Horizon3 Runner requirement for authenticated tests | docs.horizon3.ai/portal/test_types/webapp/ | 2026-09-14 |
| 13 | Hadrian positioning; SOC 2 badge; Gartner/GigaOm/Frost recognition; customer wall | hadrian.io/ | 2026-10-28 |
| 14 | Hadrian Atlas coverage + add-ons + external-only framing | hadrian.io/atlas | 2026-10-28 |
| 15 | Hadrian Nova target framing, 24–48h, evidence, €1,250 | hadrian.io/nova, hadrian.io/pricing | 2026-10-28 |
| 16 | B-52 column claims (eleven classes, three delivery models, $500/$299, four CI systems, deployment/residency, 90–95%, CERT-In 2008) | b52security.com/platform/, /capabilities/, /compare/* and src-b52/data/ | 2026-09-14 baseline |
First-party sources, per claim family
1
- Claim family
- Pentera module structure; Core coverage incl. OWASP Top 10; guardrails
- Source
- pentera.io/pentera-platform/, pentera.io/pentera-core/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28
2
- Claim family
- Pentera Surface: APIs as asset class; phishing emulation
- Source
- pentera.io/pentera-surface/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14
3
- Claim family
- Pentera Cloud: AWS/Azure capabilities
- Source
- pentera.io/pentera-cloud/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14
4
- Claim family
- Pentera web-app beta/GA sentence
- Source
- pentera.io/press-release/pentera-ai-web-app-pentesting/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28
5
- Claim family
- Pentera SECTOR11 scope (mobile, thick client, AI red teaming)
- Source
- pentera.io/adversarial-testing-services/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14
6
- Claim family
- Pentera SAST ingestion, not review; integrations
- Source
- pentera.io/integrations/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14
7
- Claim family
- XBOW supported asset types + roadmap + untestable conditions
- Source
- docs.xbow.com/console/reference/asset-types (moved from /target-types/)
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28
8
- Claim family
- XBOW platform autonomy + governance language
- Source
- xbow.com/platform
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14
9
- Claim family
- XBOW track record (HackerOne, MSRC, CVEs)
- Source
- xbow.com/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14
10
- Claim family
- Horizon3 tier contents; WebApp add-on; per-asset figures
- Source
- horizon3.ai/pricing/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14; re-read 2026-10-28
11
- Claim family
- Horizon3 internal/external/cloud/Kubernetes/WebApp module pages
- Source
- horizon3.ai/nodezero/ (+ subpages)
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14
12
- Claim family
- Horizon3 Runner requirement for authenticated tests
- Source
- docs.horizon3.ai/portal/test_types/webapp/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14
13
- Claim family
- Hadrian positioning; SOC 2 badge; Gartner/GigaOm/Frost recognition; customer wall
- Source
- hadrian.io/
- Last verified
- 2026-10-28
14
- Claim family
- Hadrian Atlas coverage + add-ons + external-only framing
- Source
- hadrian.io/atlas
- Last verified
- 2026-10-28
15
- Claim family
- Hadrian Nova target framing, 24–48h, evidence, €1,250
- Source
- hadrian.io/nova, hadrian.io/pricing
- Last verified
- 2026-10-28
16
- Claim family
- B-52 column claims (eleven classes, three delivery models, $500/$299, four CI systems, deployment/residency, 90–95%, CERT-In 2008)
- Source
- b52security.com/platform/, /capabilities/, /compare/* and src-b52/data/
- Last verified
- 2026-09-14 baseline
Horizon3’s prices carry their read date and expire on the next re-read; the €1,250 figure is Hadrian’s own, quoted, never compared as a ratio.
"Adversarial Exposure Validation" appears in this register only inside Hadrian’s quoted recognition claim and Pentera’s category-language claims table: never as our vocabulary.
Hadrian has no /compare/ page; its cells here are the canonical record until one is commissioned.
How this matrix was built As of 28 October 2026
- Every cell was read on the vendor’s own first-party pages: never on a summary, a review site or a competitor’s page about them.
- Each cell carries its verdict, the vendor’s published language behind it, and a dated citation on the row beneath it.
- Absence on a first-party page is stated as an absence of documentation as of the read date, never as an absence of capability.
- Four concessions are made, one per competitor, each naming what they do better than B-52.
Deliberately excluded
- No price ratio appears anywhere on this page. Each side’s published figure stands beside its own source and date, and the arithmetic is the buyer’s.
- No third-party recognition claim made about a vendor is adopted as a fact of ours.
- Physical, hardware and wireless testing are out of scope for B-52 entirely, and nothing is claimed about any vendor’s position there.
Compare the vendors page by page
Three of the four have full comparison pages, each opening on what the other product does better, with every claim sourced and dated. Hadrian’s record sits in the register above until one is written.